Page 310 - Conflitti Militari e Popolazioni Civili - Tomo I
P. 310

310                                XXXIV Congresso della CommIssIone InternazIonale dI storIa mIlItare • CIHm

           seven were seriously injured. Due to poor rations and a prohibition on leaves, the soldiers
           who had returned from Russian captivity set their barracks on fire, and then went into town,
           where they pillaged and consumed considerable quantities of alcohol. In the camp four sol-
           diers died and four were injured in the course of a clash between the mutineers and loyal
           troops. Order was restored by combat troops and the gendarmerie that arrived in the early
           hours of 13. By 15, all the rebels were collected from the environs, and three of the leaders
           were court-martialled. 30
              On 21 May, the reserve battalion of the Royal Hungarian 15th Infantry Regiment, almost
           entirely composed of Slovaks, revolted in Trencsén (Trenčín). The 2nd company, comprising
           soldiers who had just returned from captivity, refused the provisions of sour carrots and cot-
           tage-cheese dumplings. The mutineers struck down the company commander by the stock of
           a rifle, as he was passing the troops in review. Order was finally restored by the commander
           of the reserve battalion.
              On 28 May, the reserve company of the Imperial and Royal 29th Field Rifle Battalion
           also demonstrated against starvation in Losonc (Lučenec). At the issuing of the morning
           orders, the leaders of those who had returned from Russian captivity told their 2nd lieutenant
           that they would disobey all orders until the standard of provisions would be increased. With
           the help of the unit’s two combat companies the entire unit was locked up in a camp. Seven
           soldiers were court-martialled.
              On 5 June, after their return from captivity, 307 Slovakian soldiers of the 72nd “common”
           Infantry Regiment’s reserve battalion revolted in Pozsony (Bratislava) and they beat their
           sergeant. The commanders, together with the Hungarian and German troops of the battalion,
           restored order. Six leaders were court-martialled, two of them were hanged. 31
              In the evening of 29 May, in Sajócseg, near Miskolc, 150 soldiers of the 5th Requisi-
           tion Company of the Royal Hungarian 305th Infantry Regiment’s 2nd Battalion incited
           others to protest against war and they refused to go to the front. They shot in the air using
           live ammunition, set prisoners free from the jail, and then returned to their barracks. On
           the following day, five combat companies of the Royal Hungarian 10th Infantry Regiment
           arrived from Miskolc and disarmed the entire battalion. The court-martial sentenced two
           soldiers to death, but one of the verdicts was later amended to eight years’ imprisonment.
           50 accused soldiers were handed over to the court-martial of the Royal Hungarian 51st
           Infantry Division. Until October, the above was the only mutiny performed by a field unit
           on a hinterland mission. 32
              On 20 May, one of the greatest mutinies broke out in Pécs. 500 former prisoners-of-
           war and 70 recruits of the 3rd Company of the 6th “common” Infantry Regiment’s reserve
           battalion, which was mainly composed of Serbians, refused to line up in the morning and
           hailed peace. The soldiers ravaged the barracks and obtained weapons. A military police



           30   Plaschka, Haselsteiner and Suppan. Vol. I: 315-319; Farkas: 138-139; Tóth: 103; Wassermair, Otto. Die
               Meutereien der Heimkehrer aus russischen Kriegsgefangenschaft bei den Ersatzkörpern der k. u. k. Armee
               im Jahre 1918. A Dissertation. (Vienna, 1968): 142-150.
           31   Plaschka, Haselsteiner and Suppan. Vol. I: 320-322; Farkas: 144-145, 149; Tóth: 103-104; Wassermair: 151-
               154.
           32   Plaschka, Haselsteiner and Suppan. Vol. I: 323; Farkas: 147-148; Tóth: 104.
   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315