Page 417 - 1992 - XVIII Congresso Internazionale di Storia Militare
P. 417

HOW THE MIUTARY THINKING AND ORGANlZATION OF THE
               U. S.  ARMY lNFLUENCED THE GREEK  ARMY



                                                    ANGELOS  l.AZAJUS


          le is  an  inconrroverùble rrutb, l believe,  thar the milirary thinking,  docrrine
       an d organizarion of the army of any country depend oo a numher of facrors wbich
       play a decisive role in the moulding of the army of thac country. These fanors are
       che  following:
         che geographic location and geosrracegic  importance of thar counrry;
         che gcographic condirions and shape of thar country, tbe configurarion of irs
         rerrain and  irs  road  nerwork;
         che exrernal orientacion, che foreign policy and rhe narional goals which have
         been  ser;
         rhe mission of rh c army forche supporr of foreign policy and national imcresrs;
         tbc economy of thar country and ics industriai capabiliries, upon which the avaiJ-
         able means, the cquipment and the numcrical sucngth of irs army heavily depend;
         rhe  popularion of thar country and  irs culrural leve!.
          The aforememioned facrocs shape che milirary rhinking an d ouclook of a coun-
      cry's army,  which consisc of che  following five  fundamenral  elemenrs:
         rhe  docuine;
         the methods whereby warfare is  conducred:
         tbe suucrure of che army (organization and war  marerial);
         tbe adjusrmenc an d degrec of iocorporarion of the army imo tbe sociery of che
         counuy.
          Sincc che  facrors which were  inirially mencioned cannot be idencicaJ  in any
      rwo councries,  ir  follows  narurally char  che  fundamenraJ  elemenrs of the milirary
      structure which are shaped by these factors will also be differenr. This is  panicu-
      larly rrue of big armies whose differences are derermined by tbe degree of vari ance
      of che conditions in which they were developed.  In small counuies, bowcvcr, chis
      is noc complerely appropriare because rhey must necessarily be subjecr ro che exrer·
      nal influence of che greacer  powers wbich affero how their milicary chinking and
      scrucrurc is shaped far more chan ro interna! facrors. The extenr of external influences
      whi.ch a smaJI country is subjcccs co  depends on ics economie and indusrrial capa-
      bilities, o n the degree co whicb tbis country is associared with o ne of che grear pow-
      ers in whose spherc of influence ir lies (alliances, bilateral defence pans, ecc). and
   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422