Page 172 - Airpower in 20th Century - Doctrines and Employment
P. 172

172                            airpower in 20  Century doCtrines and employment - national experienCes
                                               tH


            external interference and be conducted like in peace time drill.
               The surface-to-air missiles attack cell was not aware of the air combat and con-
            frontations that took place at the same time, during which 26 Syrian jets were downed
            in 40 minutes after being sent to disrupt our attack.
               Upon  opening  our  attack  on  the  surface-to-air  missiles  at  14:00,  all  airborne
            Syrian planes were diverted east and sent for immediate landing. In fact, within 5
            minutes there was not a single Syrian aircraft in the air. The Syrian goal was obvious.
            Allow the surface-to-air missiles to fire freely and shoot down any aircraft in the air
            without having to identify it first. Until then, the Syrians used to patrol with several
            aircraft along the Syrian-Lebanese border on the Syrian side.
               It was clear that the Syrians expected impressive achievements from its surface-
            to-air missiles, in light of their success during the Yom Kippur war.
               However, within 20 minutes of the attack, the Syrian command suffered a great
            disappointment. The surface-to-air missiles were desperate for air protection in order
            to defend itself from the effective IAF attacks. Syrian aircraft were sent blindly on a
            repeating trail, 3-5 minutes between a formation in an attempt to harass and threaten
            our attacking aircraft and disrupt the attack.
               The Syrian command center was under a lot of stress. My senses told me that the
            operation of the Syrian fighters was under panic, which made it a lot easier for me
            to control the battle. The fact that they flew the same route enabled us to ambush
            them in the most convenient places. We disrupted their control and communication
            systems with EW, which increased their panic. The Syrian command sent the aircraft
            into the Beka’a at relatively low altitude in order to search for our attacking aircraft.
            Since they could not receive guidance at such low altitude by Syrian radar, and the
            radars in Lebanon were destroyed earlier, the “interceptors” became targets to our
            aircraft that had guidance and were equipped with efficient radars.
               In this case I had to restrain our controller’s enthusiasm to conduct the intercep-
            tion without identification, which could have endangered our own planes. With the
            help of the controllers, I selected the our patrols with the best chances and sent them
            for the encounter, while others had to await their turn. On the other hand, in order to
            stop our aircraft from chasing Syrian aircraft into Syria, I instructed them to cease
            contact, so that the encounters were relatively brief, and our pilots’ agility was being
            tested. Our pilots felt confident with the orders from the command center and total
            trust in the command instructions, while entering combat like hunters more than hav-
            ing to prove their capabilities. As things evolved, we could act with more discretion
            and with fewer mistakes, so we ended with a score of 26:0. In 40 minutes we downed
            26 Syrian aircraft without losing one single aircraft of our own.
               I dragged some of the fights into an encounter above our ground forces, leading
            to the capture of 9 Syrian air crew men. The idea was to get qualitative captives in
            order to assure a quick swap of prisoners at the end of the fighting in case we lost
            any of our crew men.
   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177