Page 99 - Airpower in 20th Century - Doctrines and Employment
P. 99

between “douhetIsm” And “close AIr support”. the germAn AIr wAr doctrIne In world wAr II  99


            to when the attack would go forward will be based on a preceding enemy terrorist
            attack. It must definitely be clear that the attack is launched for retaliatory reasons.
            Retaliation attacks require a detailed knowledge and an intuitive understanding of
            the way of thinking and moral condition of the enemy population. Choosing the
            wrong time and miscalculating the desired effect on the opponent might strengthen
            his will of resistance instead of shaking it. 35
               When looking at the air war doctrine of the German Air Force within the context
            of its planned and actually implemented armaments projects, it shows that center and
                                                                             36
            pivotal point of the German air war doctrine was the support of the Army.  To con-
            duct a strategic air war according to Douhet, Trenchard or Mitchell, the development
            of a strategic four-engine bomber capable of covering long distances would have
            been indispensable. Although Wever, in his function as the Chief of the Air Force
            General Staff, had tried to get this project under way before he died in a plane crash
            in June 1936, the project was cancelled even before the war.
               In a presentation on the subject of “Basic Principles for Operational Command
            and Control of the Air War”, delivered in October 1936, Major Paul Deichmann,
            Chief of the Command and Control Division at the Luftkommandoamt, supported
            attacks against the enemy’s sources of power on the one hand and the generic popu-
            lation’s “will of resistance” on the other in addition to support provided to Army and
            Navy operations. „The presentation illustrated, however, that in this field, too, the
            higher commanders held rather vague views and the systematic processing of related
            questions had just begun“. 37
               In  1936,  Hitler  promised  General  Franco  to  support  airlift  operations  from
            Spanish-Morocco to the Spanish mainland. After 15,000 Moroccan soldiers and le-
            gionaries of the Spanish Foreign Legion and a considerable amount of material had
            been moved with “Junkers Ju 52” aircraft, Franco was able to employ them in the
            Spanish Civil War. Germany extended its support of Franco by dispatching a sup-
            port unit by the name of “Legion Condor”, including various aircraft and pilots. The
            Spanish Civil War provided the German volunteers of the “Legion Condor”, who
            had temporarily been released from the Wehrmacht for this, with the opportunity
            to fly sorties under wartime conditions, thus being able to test the training status of
            pilots, newly developed types of aircraft and theoretical procedures in the field of
                       38
            air support.  Besides existing aircraft types, for example, the new Messerschmidt
            Me Bf 109 fighter aircraft, the fast two-engine Heinkel He 111 bombers and the
            Dornier Do 17 aircraft could be employed in Spain. Wolfram v. Richthofen, the



            35
                Ibid., p. 482.
            36
               Cf. James S. Corum, »The Luftwaffe’s Army Support Doctrine, 1918-1941«, in: Journal of Strategic
               Studies 59 (1995), p. 68-90.
            37
               Deist, Die Aufrüstung der Wehrmacht (see Note 17), p. 494.
            38
                Cf. James S. Corum, »The Luftwaffe and the Coalition Air War in Spain, 1936-1939«, in: Journal
               for Strategic Studies, 18 (1995), p. 68-90.
   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104