Page 142 - Le Operazioni Interforze e Multinazionali nella Storia Militare - ACTA Tomo II
P. 142

782                                XXXIX Congresso della CommIssIone InternazIonale dI storIa mIlItare • CIHm

           Statistics), established within the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Turin, on March 28,
                                                                                   4
           1836. In the Kingdom of Italy, after unity, the statesman treasured his experience.
              In 1861 the Ministry of Interior of the Kingdom had an Office of High Political
           Surveillance  and a Directorate-General  of Public  Security, which became  in 1879
           Direction of the Public Security Services. In 1887 the Public Security Direction was
           however reconstituted with a Prefect as its Chief.
              In the  last  two decades  of the  Nineteenth  Century,  the  Kingdom  of Italy  gained
           solidity and institutional  infrastructures:  even so the intelligence  Services began an
           evolution that in the more modern sense, for the military ones  will be effective only
           in 1925, as well as for the civilian ones, especially inclined to maintaining the Fascist
           regime security and stability.
              The majority of published studies indicates the year 1900 as the one when Italian
           military intelligence officially started but it is not so. The Information Office of the Army,
           as formally established Office, already existed in 1897, when Colonel de Chaurand de
           Saint Eustache was called to manage it, but you cannot say that the military intelligence
           did not exist prior to that date: the Section or Information Office existed well before
           1897, it received reports directly or in copy and after reading them, used to put its round
           green inked stamp on the document testifying  its actual existence. There is an historical
           explanation to this anomaly in the organization charts: the  Service Rules  had to be
           public and communicated to friendly states asking for them and then ‘fatally’ friends
           and enemies knew the real duties of the various officers assigned to the Command of
           the Royal Army: this particular detailed piece of information could have been harmful
           for those going on a mission abroad…. responsible for informative missions or simply
           to attend ceremonies or maneuvers to which the Royal Command had been invited. Not
           mentioning their particular assignment, High Commands believed that these tasks could
           escape to a tight control by foreign military organizations … This was the documented
           reason of the disappearance from 1870 to 1906 of the Office ‘I’ instead existing, working
           hard and slowly organizing itself. The Office finally came out from clandestinity with
           the Agenda no. 37 of August 23, 1906, staffed  only with a superior officer, a lieutenant
           and a clerk. Few employees and limited financial resources.
              As regards the  metropolitan  territory, it is interesting to remember  that  the
           counterintelligence was not only played by the Royal Carabinieri but also by the Finance
           Police, sending the collected information to the General Staff of the Army, and by the
           Commissari (Police Inspectors) of Public Security, especially those on duty at the border
           crossings or in the territories near by.
              At that time it had not yet been established a directive body for military information,
           because the Office was always considered a Section or even an Office but always as a
           part of an upper structure and not a sector with its own orientation and management
           autonomy.


           4    The term ‘Commission of Statistics’ was later also used in the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies in 1851. Efficient
              and ‘watchful’ Services, those of the Bourbons, but not of a great usefulness to the dynasty, because they were
              interested ‘blindly’ in the safeguard of the Crown not understanding the political evolution of the kingdom
              face to the new nationalistic spirit blowing all over the Italian Peninsula.
   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147