Page 306 - Conflitti Militari e Popolazioni Civili - Tomo II
P. 306

808                                 XXXIV Congresso della CommIssIone InternazIonale dI storIa mIlItare • CIHm

           where the State’s presence was weak or even nonexistent . Thus, this extreme rationality
                                                             53
           and adaptability shown at all levels (economic, military and political) by both illegal actors
           lead us to consider particularly efficacious the definition of post-modern conflict related to
           the Colombian case. Inside it, as Duffield noticed, has been developed a complex network
           system not exclusively reducible to concepts as those of terrorism and crime. Such an error
           in evaluation would risk negatively affecting the pursuit of a real and enduring solution to the
           long conflict that has been lacerating the Colombian society for such a long time.



           BIBlIograpHy
           Black J., War since 1945, london, Reaktion Books, 2004.
           Càrdenas J.A., Parias de la guerra. Anàlisis del proceso de desmovilizaciòn individual, Bogotá, Edi-
              ciones aurora, 2005.
           Castells M., The Rise of the Network Society (vol. 1), Blackwell, Oxford, 1996.
           Cerny P.G., “Neomedievalism, Civil War and yhe New Security Dilemma: Globalisation as Durable
              Disorder”, in Civil Wars, 1(1), sping 1998, pp. 36-64.1998.
           Clausewitz von C., Vom Kriege, Berlin, Dümmlers Verlag, 1832.
           Collier P. e Hoeffler A., “Greed and Grievance” in Oxford Economic Papers 2004, 56(4) pp.563-595.
           Collier P., “Economic Causes of Civil Conflict and their Implications for Policy”, in Crocker, Hamp-
              son, aall, Leashing the Dogs of War: conflict management in a divided world, USiP Press Books
              2007.
           State Dipartment of Washington, “2001 Report Foreign Terrorist Organizations”, 5 october 2001 by
              the Office of the Director of Counterterrorism.
           Deibert R. J., “‘Exorcismus Theoriae’: Pragmatism. Metaphors and the Return of the Medieval in I.R.
              Theory”, in European Journal of International Relations, 3(2), giugno 1997, pp.167-192..
           Duffield M., “Postmodern Conflict. Warlors, Post-Adjustment States and Private Protection” in Civil
              Wars, primavera 1998, 1 (1), pp. 65-102; Guerre postmoderne. L’aiuto umanitario come tecnica
              politica di controllo, Bologna, Casa editrice il Ponte, 2004. Global Governance and the New Wars,
              Zed Books, New York, 2001. “War as a Network Enterprise. The New Security Terrain and its
              Implications” in Cultural Values, 2002, 6(1-2), pp. 153-165.
           Duncan G., Los señores de la guerra. De paramilitares, mafiosos y autodefensas en   Colombia,  Bo-
              gotá , Editorial Planeta Colombiana, 2006.
           Duyvesteyn I., “Contemporary War: Ethnic Conflict, Resource Conflict or Something Else” in Civil
              wars, vol.3, No. 1 (Spring 2000), pp.92-116;
           el tiempo, “Contactos con 400 grupos en por lo menos siete países tienen las Farc para expandirse
              por América”, 10 may 2008.


           53   One of the most important opportunities capitalized by illegal groups was the constitutional reform aiming to
               democratize the country. Inside an administrative decentralization process, in 1988 was approved the mayors
               direct election. Paradoxically this important reform became the main illegal organizations instrument to
               control the local political life and the public resources; see Sánchez F. and Chacòn M, “Conflicto, Estado y
               descentralización: del progreso social a la disputa armada por el control local, 1974-2002” in Nuestra guerra
               sin nombre, 2006.
   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311