Page 111 - Airpower in 20th Century - Doctrines and Employment
P. 111

111
            tHe plaCe of douHet: a reassessment


            time - either at first hand, or through Italian airmen, or in written form. In any case, it
            would be strange indeed if British airmen serving in Italy were not greatly impressed
            by both the Italian’s strategic bombing campaign and by the enemy bombing of Ital-
            ian cities: all the evidence does in fact show that, just like the US Bolling Mission,
            British airmen were greatly impressed by what they saw and heard in Italy. And
            what of Caproni? All the evidence, not least Caproni’s diaries, shows clearly that he
            had a very close relationship with the British air contingents in Italy; both of which
            participated in the Italian strategic bombing campaign. Moreover, a squadron of his
            giant CA42 triplanes was expressly built for, and operated by, the RNAS contingent.
            Caproni was later awarded the OBE by a grateful Britain in recognition of his many
            wartime services. In view of the above, I believe there is a need for a full examina-
            tion of Joubert’s role at the Staff College in the 20s and 30s. There is clear evidence
            that records relating both to the RFC contingent in Italy and to Italian aviation during
            the war were supplied by the old AHB to the Staff College in the 20s, many at Jou-
            bert’s request. In 1927 the Staff College obtained an original copy of “The Command
            of the Air.”
               Joubert’s adjutant in Italy was William Wedgewood Benn (later Secretary of State
            for Air). Benn, who spoke Italian very well, devoted a large portion of his wartime
            memoirs “In the Side Shows” to his service in Italy. He writes, admiringly, of the
            Italian’s use of Caproni bombers against Austria. Referring to his strong belief in
            large, multi-engined aircraft of “untold possibilities”, he writes: “under the influence
            of Caproni in Italy, this partisanship became a definite part of my aerial faith”. Benn
            was a tireless and influential lobbyist in Parliament and in the press for the cause of
            independent airpower in the inter-war period. He was intimately associated with the
            Air Service Parliamentary Committee and was a fierce critic of the Navy’s attitude
            towards the RAF, championing Trenchard’s famous December 1919 air policy state-
            ment, and appearing before the Salisbury investigation into the RN/RAF controversy
            in July 1923. He revisited Italy in 1927, when he met leading Fascists.
               The first commander of the RNAS contingent was Murray Sueter. (Benn had
            also served with the RNAS contingent in Italy; the two men were friends). During
            his time in Italy, Sueter was much concerned with the development of the RNAS
            Caproni squadron. Like Benn, after the war Sueter was a tireless and influential lob-
            byist in Parliament (having been elected in 1922) and in the press for the cause of
            independent airpower, was likewise intimately connected with the Air Service Par-
            liamentary Committee, and also appeared before the Salisbury investigation. When
            serving in Italy he would no doubt have been drawn to such like-minded men as
            Douhet and Caproni.
               The evidence presented above is crystal clear that Caproni’s many and varied
            contacts extended to British airmen. Was Benn the only British airman influenced by
            him? I think it is highly improbable. I believe it is highly probable that he had some
            influence on a number of British airmen - directly, and not just via the French and
            American airmen with whom he was closely associated. (Both France and the US
   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116