Page 114 - Airpower in 20th Century - Doctrines and Employment
P. 114

114                            airpower in 20  Century doCtrines and employment - national experienCes
                                               tH


               A long detailed and highly enthusiastic report on Italian aviation, and especially
            its strategic bombing campaign, written by Capt.-Commandant Lebon of the Techni-
            cal Branch of the Belgian Air Service, was forwarded to Trenchard in October 1917.
            Lebon wrote admiringly and at length of “crushing” attacks on Austrian targets by 30
            and 40 Capronis at a time, enthused about the potential of the Caproni triplane, and
            concluded by saying that in the field of strategic bombing the Italians “are far ahead
            of all other nations”.
               Moreover, referring to the summer of 1918, Baring later recalled (significantly
            I think) that: “During this period we had a great deal to do with the American, the
            French and the Italian aviation. The Italians had a Squadron of Caproni machines
            quite close to us”. And finally, Caproni - accompanied by his friend Eugenio Chie-
            sa, the Italian Commissioner for Aviation - actually visited Trenchard at his HQ in
            France in 1918. Could the influence of Caproni explain both Trenchard’s insistence
            on the need for the bombing of enemy airfields to achieve air superiority before a
            strategic bombing campaign could properly begin, and also Trenchard’s insistence
            that the morale of the enemy civil population should be the main target of a strategic
            bombing campaign? (Trenchard’s insistence on those points stayed with him, undi-
            minished, throughout his life).
               Furthermore,  given  the  testimony  of  Hoare,  is  it  really  likely  that  in  the  20s
            Trenchard was totally unaware of Douhet’s ideas? As shown below, Trenchard was
            certainly aware of Douhet by 1928. Is it in fact credible that the very close similar-
            ity between the ideas of Trenchard and Douhet was (as Higham says) mere coinci-
            dence?
               I consider the evidence indisputable that, right from the earliest days, a close
            international aeronautical community existed; and that, even in the earliest days, its
            members had frequent opportunities to meet each other and to exchange information
            and ideas. At the outset it should be remembered that, ever since the mid-nineteenth
            century, each major nation had serving officers attached to its Embassies abroad - in-
            cluding, eventually, Air Attaches. And, at the risk of stating the obvious, the primary
            task of such officers was to familiarise themselves with the armed forces of the coun-
            try in which they were serving, and to keep the authorities back in their own country
            informed of any developments.
               Following the Wright brother’s sensational tour of Europe in 1908-9, air displays,
            competitions and conferences became a regular part of the aviation scene. And by
            the 20s, such events had become institutionalised. Among the many air displays,
            the one held annually at Hendon was one of the most famous; and among the many
            competitions, one automatically thinks of the headline-making Schneider Trophy
            contests e.g. the one at Venice, hosted by Balbo and Andriani, in 1927. Of the many
            Aviation Congresses and Conferences, the ones held in Rome in October 1923 - pre-
            sided over by our old friend Mercanti, then Italian Commissioner for Civil Aviation
            - and October 1927 were among the most notable.
               WWI was responsible for bringing French, Italian, British and US aviation closer
   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119