Page 238 - Le Operazioni Interforze e Multinazionali nella Storia Militare - ACTA Tomo I
P. 238

238                                XXXIX Congresso della CommIssIone InternazIonale dI storIa mIlItare • CIHm

           in the defense of Silistra, and on the Russian side, Marshal Paskevitch was wounded.
           Still, there were a great number of lives lost during the Crimean War resulting from
           not only the conflicts between the belligerent parties but also diseases. British Marshal
           Raglan (June 29, 1855), Commander-in-chief of the Allied armies, and French Marshal
           Saint Arnaud (September 29 1854 – Alma river) died of cholera. During the Crimean
           War, weapons had evolved but the medical facilities had not ever developed. Florance
           Nigtingale created miracles at Istanbul Selimiye Barracks with the nurses beside her,
           and the Selimiye Barracks became a place where the wounded coming from the north of
           Black Sea were cured, dropping the death rate.
              Construction of railways by Russia in all the harbors of the Black Sea, from Kefe
           [Caffa] to Odessa, due to the problems in the transfer of the soldiers during the war;
           works such as drying up some swamp areas in Crimea, construction of bridges there,
           and installation of railed systems represent the first heritage left by the allied troops to
           the peninsula on account of the combined landing in the Crimean War.
              When the war broke out, another reality came to the fore as well. In that war, Russia
           understood that fighting with Turks was not an easy task because of the commanding
           superiority of the Ottoman officers educated in the Military Academy, the contributions
           of the Polish-Hungarian refugees and the presence of the war industry.
                                                                         38
              Russia caused the death of many people from every social class on the Crimean
           peninsula during this war, which lasted two and a half years. The cruelty of war can be
           better understood from the work of the famous writer Lev Tolstoy, “Sevastopol 1855”,
                                                    39
           rather than history books and military reports.
              In conclusion, the Crimean War, in which Britain, France and Piedmont-Sardinian
           Kingdom took the side of the Ottoman Empire against Russia 160 years ago in order to
           prevent the Russian Mediterranean dream, can be qualified as both the first modern world
           war and the first “combined operation” where the Turkish army took part in modern
           terms. In that war, the Ottomans allied themselves with the Western European states for
           the first time, and in addition, the first trench warfare, the first wire communication, and
           the first war photographs appeared on the history scene during this war. Furthermore,
           this war is the first one that introduced the Ottoman State to the migration problem. In
           this war, the Crimean people, including not only the Muslim Turks but also Crimean
           Jews, met their rescuers in an atmosphere of bloody clashes. Therefore, a few years later,
           all these ethnic groups, most of which were the local people of the Crimean peninsula,
           and the Crimean Tatars, a Turkish and Muslim people, had to migrate and take refuge
           in the Ottoman Empire in great numbers.  Crimean Tatars were also the first Muslim
                                                40
           38  İlber  Ortaylı,  Atlas  Tarih,  “160.Yılında  Kırım  Savaşı-Rusya  Akdeniz’e  İnmemeli”,  Dogan  Yayincilik,
              Istanbul, Issue 20, June-July 2013, pp. 70-73.
           39  Crimean War was a turning point for the Turkish War Literature as well. The first to remember among the

              works on this war is certainly “Vatan yahut Silistre”, the theatrical work by Namik Kemal examining the
              theme of Silistra Blockade. That Silistra was defended heroically by the Turks and Russians were finally
              forced to retreat was met with great joy in the rear area of the front. Namik Kemal revives this significant
              victory with “Vatan yahut Silistre”, approximately 19 years after the war. This work emphasizes that love for
              motherland is superior to the love for humans. See Ömer Çakır, ibid., p.1855.
           40  İlber Ortaylı, Milliyet Daily, 04.10.2009.
   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243