Page 199 - The Secret War in the Italian front in WWI (1915-1918)
P. 199

CHAPTER NINE














































                  Picture 5


                  BEI ORSOVA HABEN UNSERE TRUPPEN WIEDER GELÄNDE GEWONNEN. SÜDLICH
                  VON HATZEG VERLOREN DIE RUMEN (near Orsova our troops have gained ground again.
                  South of Hatzeg romanians have lost [it]).
                  The reference to the two Romanian towns of Orsova and Hatzeg is interesting, since after the
                  initial Romanian advance, Falkenhayn’s counterattack had started on 18 September 1916 exactly
                  in the area between those towns. The two pages of the notebook seem to include dispatches of
                  the German army operating in the Balkan peninsula, transmitted a few days after the mentioned
                  events.
                  Other pages (picture 6)  display the decryption of a message made of 74 letters and reported at the
                                       51
                  top left of the page. This kind of encryption, too, is based on transposition by means of irregular
                  rectangles, with key, that is with columns mixed according to a set order that is the key order .
                                                                                                         52
                  Obviously, this kind of ciphering is more difficult to decrypt than the previous one.
                  On the left, bottom of the page, the plaintext reads:
                  ERBITTE MITTEILUNG UBER VORAUSICHTLICHE  VERWENDUNG DER RESERVE
                                                                        53
                  EISENBAHN  KOMPAGNIE (Communication  is  urged  regarding  the  predictable  use  of  the
                  railway company in reserve).



                  51  The page has no date yet, as the previous one, can be dated back to early October 1916.
                  52  Key-transposed encoding was described in paragraph 6.4.
                  53  This is a misprint: “vorausichtlich” instead of “voraussichtlich”.


                                                                                                     197
   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204