Page 340 - The Secret War in the Italian front in WWI (1915-1918)
P. 340

THE SECRET WAR ON THE ITALIAN FRONT IN WWI (1915 – 1918)




              This Office is also credited with the support given, following the first months of the conflict, to
              the creation of a telephone interception service within the Armies and with the attempts to remedy
              the cryptologic deficiencies undergone at the beginning of the war.
              In 1915 the Italian army was, in fact, devoid of any structure devoted to interpreting the enemy
              radio dispatches intercepted in large numbers, and to improving the Italian codes and ciphers. Most
              of the Italian radio dispatches, except those encrypted with some codes distributed only to High
              Commands, were read by Austrian analysts led by the talented cryptologist Andreas Figl.
              The success achieved by the Austro-Hungarians depended on several and interrelated reasons such
              as: their pre-war accurate planning, including the purchase of several Italian codes; the weakness
              and age of the latter, for the most part unchanged since more than a decade; the capture of some
              new Italian ciphers and instructions during the fighting; the ‘partial encoding’ adopted by the
              Italians in the early days of war; and last but not least, the poor preparation of operators in Italian
              encoding branches and radiotelegraphic sections.
              However, soon Italian Headquarters became aware of the danger posed by radio interceptions
              and systematically avoided transmitting confidential information and specially operational orders
              toward subordinate units. Nevertheless, the considerable amount of dispatches available to the
              Austro-Hungarian analysts - even deprived of any sensitive information - helped in breaking new
              codes and ciphers, so that when, in lack of other means of communication, some units were forced
              to transmit some important orders by radio, they found Austro-Hungarians more than ready to
              comprehend them and to gain some cryptologic success, as during Strafexpedition in May 1916.
              On the other side, to make up for the inability to decrypting the enemy radio dispatches, the
              Intelligence Office created, in the spring of 1916, a cryptographic team within the radiotelegraphic
              office in Codroipo (Udine), under the command of Luigi Sacco who soon began to break some
              enemy ciphers.
              In this regard, the  chances of solving  enemy  codes and ciphers  also depended  on the  radio
              communication strategies and methods adopted by the opponents. In fact, it is proven that the
              Austro-Hungarian  Headquarters  prohibited  exploiting  field  radio  stations  for  communicating
              between units after 1915, focusing mainly on the interception of Italian dispatches. When enforced,
              this strategy limited the cryptographic material available to Sacco and his team, but also severely
              disadvantaged the Austro-Hungarian army when the conflict turned into a war of movement.
              On several occasions, the Italians too were able to maintain ‘radio silence’ as it was possible along the
              Isonzo front where, thanks to the milder climate and more comfortable environmental conditions than
              in Trentino, wire connections were used almost continuously. For example, in August 1916, before the
              Sixth Battle of the Isonzo, the lack of significant interceptions together with deception operations put in
              place by the Italian Intelligence Office, contributed to disorienting the Austro-Hungarian Headquarters
              for good. The shortage of any information achieved by radio eavesdropping before the Italian attack that
              led to the conquest of Gorizia, spurred a lively debate within the Imperial Army on the usefulness of the
              interception and cryptanalysis services. Similar criticism emerged the following year after the Battle of
              the Bainsizza Plateau, since General Boroevic proposed to remove the entire service due to the useless
              operational information it had acquired.
              In  the  other  sectors  of  Radio  Intelligence  -  including  interception,  traffic  analysis,  and
              radiogoniometry  -  the  Italian  army  benefited  from  the  in-depth  knowledge  acquired  before
              the conflict and from the availability of modern equipment supplied by the Italian and British
              Marconi or manufactured in its plants. Thanks to the experiments in the field of radiogoniometry
              conducted since 1907, the Royal army adopted this technique well before the Austro-Hungarians
              and, after the first months of the conflict, succeeded in implementing a strict control on enemy
              radio communications. Even before the summer of 1916, when the decrypting of the enemy radio



                338
   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345