Page 60 - Airpower in 20th Century - Doctrines and Employment
P. 60

60                            airpower in 20  Century doCtrines and employment - national experienCes
                                               tH


            the contemporary doctrine linking the operational peacetime principles of peacetime
            training and wartime action, as the Royal Air Force War Manual published in 1950,
                                                                      4
            the contemporary doctrine of the Royal Air Force, put the matter.
               The article focuses almost entirely on the British part of the operation. The French
            participation is consciously left on the sidetrack, but not because their participation
            is  uninteresting.  On  the  contrary,  the  French  possessed  some  extremely  exiting
            and modern concepts worth of further research such as airborne and psychological
            operations or tactical employment of ultra modern 7 Division Mécanique Rapide.
            However,  L’Armée  de  l’Air  did  not  have  a  doctrine  or  the  resources  to  conduct
            strategic air operations that are the main focus of this article.


            Strike Hard, Strike Sure – the Principles of British Air Power

               “Allied Air Power was decisive in the war in Western Europe. Hindsight inevitably
            suggests that it might have been employed differently or better in some respects.
            Nevertheless it was decisive” 5
               It is no coincidence that John Slessor, Marshal of the Royal Air Force, a former
            Chief of Air Staff and a well known protagonist of air power, quoted the United
            States Strategic Bombing Survey in his 1954 book Strategy for the West. In the
            absence of missiles, Britain’s forthcoming nuclear deterrence was to be based on the
            Royal Air Force. The RAF was to become the primary arm since it was to deliver
            Britain’s nuclear inventory if deterrence failed.
               During the Suez Crisis, air power was to play a predominant role in the Allied
            attack plans. To understand the background for the decisions made in these plans, it is
            relevant to review the ideas of aerial warfare that prevailed at the time in the United
            Kingdom. The tactics introduced during the Second World War still prevailed in the
            British Army. But did the lessons of the war provide an empirical basis also for the
            Royal Air Force in the mid-1950s? Had the role of air forces changed since the Second
            World War? What were the principles of applying air power in a Limited War?
               The  basic  foundations  of  the  air  force  doctrine  originated  from  a  holistic
            understanding of a country’s capacity to wage war. According to the Royal Air Force
            War Manual, the war potential of the enemy consisted of various factors such as
            the armed forces, morale, industrial and economic capacity, scientific research and
            manpower. Most of the physical manifestations of these factors were located inside
            enemy territory. This led to the logical conclusion that “the basic weapon of the air
            force is the bomber and the basic strategy of Air Power must be offensive”.
                                                                               6
            4
               Royal Air Force War Manual, Operations (AP 1300, 1950), introduction.
            5
               John Slessor, Strategy for the West (London: Cassell & Co, 1954), p. 96. Originally quoted in the
               United States Strategic Bombing Survey, Over-all Report (European War), September 30, 1945,
               (Washington D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1945), p. 107.
            6
               Royal Air Force War Manual, Part 1, Operations (Air Ministry, 1950), pp. 2-5, 19.
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65