Page 251 - Il Mediterraneo quale elemento del Potere Marittimo - Atti 16-18 settembre 1996
P. 251

THE  NORTH AFRICAN CAMPAIGN,  NOVEMBER  1942 · MAY  1943                237

           The British who were responsible for  naval operations in the western Medi-
      terranean, were too pre-occupied with consolidating the Allied army in the Algiers
      area  and occupyng the  ports to the  east - Bougie,  Philippeville and Bone  - to
      spare  any  major  effort against  the  early Axis  movements  to Tunisia.
           The latter suffered no  loss to direct action during November, but the Allies
      lost  over  180 000 tons  of shipping in the  first eight days  of Operation  "Torch"
      to German and ltalian aircraft and submarines - a rate of loss which far exceeded
      the worst period of the Battle of the Adantic, which  was  simultaneously coming
      to  its  climax.  The surprising feature  is  that none  of the losses  had more than a
      very brief local effect on the development of the North African campaign and Bri-
      tish military and air force  casualties were very slight - {3 7  British soldiers  an d
      airmen killed or missing between 8 and 13 November, compared with 624 naval
      perso n nel].
           By 26 November, the leading British Army units had thrust as  dose 40 km
      as  25 miles to Tunis in a bid to take the port by a coup de main. This failed against
      a  hastily-organised  last-ditch  defence  and  the  British  withdrew  to  await  rein-
      forcement and  resupply.  The ports along the Algerian coast were  quickly put to
      work  and  by  mid-December  they  were  handling a  total  of lO 000  tons  of fuel,
      ammunition, stores  and rations  per day.  Unfortunately,  the logistic support had
      been calculated on the basis of occupation, not offensive operations and not until
      mid-December did the motor transport capacity reach that intended figure of 6600
      tons. There was a railway,  but {under the terms of che Allied agreement with the
      French administration] this was operated by the French (using coal shipped from
      Britain) and had to be shared with civilian traffic who  seemed to be accustomed
      to the 650km journey from Algiers to the Algerian-Tunisian border taking up to
      six days. Not surprisingly, the British Army, which was responsible for the capture
      of Tunis while the US  Army guarded against a  Spanish  invasion,  was unable  to
      mount a  serious  offensive  before the end  of the year.
           With the Army' s supplies guaranteed as  far  as  the ports, a t  least,  the Royal
      Navy units in the western Mediterranean were able to begin offensive operations
      against the Axis  shipping plying between  Sicily and Tunis.
           The immunity of attack enjoyed  by this traffic ended abrupdy and brutally
      on the· n.ight-of l:/2 December;wherra·cruiser and destroyer force,  despatched on
      the basis of intercepted enemy signals, sank all four laden merchant ships of a con-
      voy as  one of che  escorting ltalian destroyers;  the same night,  a torpedo-bomber
      from Malta sank a loaded tanker. This surface raid was  not repeated until the clo-
      sing stages of the campaign and instead of the  possibilities of annihilation which
      this  form  of attack offered,  the Royal  Navy employed  weapons  of attrition-sub-
      marines, torpedo-aircraft and mines laid inside che  defensive fields  by fast mine-
      layers, while the Allied air forces,  which had arrived in North Africa without any
      specialist anti-shipping units, bombed the loading and unloading ports by day and
      night,  whenever  the  particularly bad winter  of 1942/43  allowed.
   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256