Page 80 - Le Operazioni Interforze e Multinazionali nella Storia Militare - ACTA Tomo II
P. 80

720                                XXXIX Congresso della CommIssIone InternazIonale dI storIa mIlItare • CIHm

           that the famine was only partly due to the drought in the region.  The major factor in the
           unfolding humanitarian disaster was the political chaos and fighting between the various
           clans and sub-clans in that troubled region.  The main chance to change that particular
           equation and resolve both issues—famine and anarchy—was during the UNITAF mul-
           tinational intervention starting under UN auspices in December 1992 where a U.S.-led
           coalition of 38 nations held the dominant position in the country.  And it was the flawed
           transition to UNOSOM II and the reduction of that military force, complicated by the
           expansion of the mission to include efforts to capture one of the key warlords, Moham-
           med Farah Aideed, which ultimately doomed the effort.  The result was the failure of
           all western efforts to rescue Somalia from political chaos: efforts which were compli-
           cated by the widely divergent capabilities of national forces, the inability of the UN to
           establish a credible command and control structure, and the shift in mission starting in
           May 1993 from one of humanitarian relief to an aggressive form of nation-building that
           would have changed the political balance in the country.  As a consequence of this fail-
           ure, Somalia’s downward spiral for the last two decades into the status of “failed nation”
           continues to this day.
              The political and economic situation in Somalia in 1992 and the reasons behind the
           western intervention into the affairs of Somalia are well known.  The political chaos re-
           sulting from the collapse of the regime of Somali strongman Mohammed Siad Barre in
           1991 led to the descent of the region into sectarian and ethnic warfare with the creation
                                       2
           of numerous regional warlords.   With the collapse of political order came a collapse of
           the various western aid organizations’ relief networks.
              Those networks were already stressed by the endemic poverty of the region and this
           was compounded by a severe drought in the southern region of the country.  With the
           failure of political order came attacks on food warehouses, raids on relief convoys, and
           starvation on a vast scale.  UN and early U.S. attempts at improving the distribution net-
           works were only small band-aids placed on gaping wounds, resulting in UN Resolution
           751 on 24 April 1992 which authorized UNOSOM I, U.S. airlift operations beginning in
           August, and finally a U.S. led multinational force intervention in December 1992--UNI-
           TAF.
              The Unified Task Force or UNITAF, (called by the U.S. Operation Restore Hope)
           was almost immediately successful.  UN Security Council Resolution 794 endorsed the
           intervention on 3 December and U.S. and multinational forces were on the ground on 9
           December.  The operation was joined by large components of troops from France, Italy,
           Belgium, Morocco, Australia, Pakistan, Malaysia, and Canada for a total of 20 nations.
              The operation was organized so that each nation had a major and sometimes inde-
           pendent role to play, but as part of an operation coordinated by the U.S. and backed us
           logistics and firepower. 3

           2    Richard W. Stewart, The United States Army in Somalia, 1992-1994, Washington, D.C.: U. S. Army Center
              of Military History, 2002, p. 2.
           3    Robert F. Baumann and Lawrence A. Yates with Versalle F. Washington, “My Clan Against the World”, US
              and Coalition Forces in Somalia 1992-1994.  Fort Leavenworth, KS: Combat Studies Institute Press,  pp.
              30-31. The UNITAF organizational chart is from page 31.
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85