Page 380 - 1992 - XVIII Congresso Internazionale di Storia Militare
P. 380

346                                              TeRUAKI KAWANO

              Afcer che signing of che Arms Reduction Treary in Washington,  che second
           revis.ion of che lmpetial Defense Policy was carried our. As che navy was consrrained
          by che creary co tbe rario of 6 co  lO cegarding number of che  large ships charJapan
          and che Unired Srares could possess respectively, ir was essential ro offser che Unir-
          ed Srares Navy's numerica( advanrage. Therefore che  naval scraregy ac  char time
          enphasized rhar Japan should gradually desrroy che  ene.my's mai o force as  much
          as possible by using au.x:iliary vessels such as cruisers, desrroyers, submarines, aod
          airplanes before an enemy force  could  reach  the terrirorial warers of Japan. As a
           result.  a  oaval  build up concenuating on  auxiliary vessels  was carcied ou.r.

          The Breakdown of che N a val Anns Limiration Treary and che Fall of rhe Scraregy
              ln Augusr of 1936, a fìve-minister-confereoce injapan resulred in che so-called
           "Bases of NationaJ Policy". Larer, io che Far Easr milirary c.rial held afrer che war,
           this basic concepr of nacio.naJ policy was nored as being che fìrsc offìciaJ policy rhac
           approved Japan's souchward advance.menr. Regarding chis  narional  policy, .Prime
           Mioisrer Kohki Hiroca stared co  foreign minisrer Sigeru Tohgoh after che end of
           che war, char  che  policy was  norhing more signifìcanr chan  a  means of juscìfying
           the navy's arms expansion projecr, which had been initiared afrer che cancellation
           of rhe  Arms Reduccion  Treary 19l.
              In June of 1936, a chird  revi.sion of the Imperlai Defense Policy was drafred
           ro  manage rhe  oon-milirary-rreary situarion. In  rhe coordinarion  phase,  rhere was
           serious disagreemenr on che issue of describing che United Stares and Sovier as che
           mosr importane porencial enemies of Japan. This disagreemenr cenrered  on how
           prioriries regarding che poremial ·enemies  were co  be ser.
              ln  che Impeciai Defense  Policy  che  pJ:ioriry was che  Unircd Srares  firsr and
           che Soviet Union second, bu.t in che lmperial Defense Guideline, the order was che
           Soviet  Union was  fìrsc  and  rhe Unired Srares second.  However,  in  che  lmperial
           Defense Policy a  note was addedsrating cbar che giveo order of che  Unireci Srnres
           and che Sovier Union was not imended to reflecr che relative imporrance of rhese
           oacions threars co  che  nacional defense OOl_  The overridiog purpose of aligning che
           "Bases of Narional Policy" an d che "lmperiaJ Defense Policy" was co esrablisb lirm
           policies, ro give priorities, and co concentrare che nar.ion's power. Yer, once again
           che army and navy failed  co  accepr a  coordinared policy.
              Wheo che spending pian forche fiscal  year  1938 was  being formulated, rhe
           army srroogly a rgued  thar che navy needed co adjusr ics docrrine co  fie che  currenr
           milirary realiry. As chere was no possibiliry of Japan 's ami-Cruna opecacion being
           canceiled,  ic  was obvious rhar a rwo  nacion enemy siruation would exist if Japan
           were co e.ngage in milirary operadons againsr any anocher country.  As a result, che
           navy was forced co abandon irs long sranding one-nation ene.my rnilirary docrrine
           and adopr a  several-na.rion encmy milit,.ry docrrine.
   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385