Page 349 - Il Mediterraneo quale elemento del Potere Marittimo - Atti 16-18 settembre 1996
P. 349

SOVIET STRATEGIC  NAVAL  INTERESTS  AND  ACTIVITIES
              IN THE EASTERN  MEDITERRANEAN  IN THE  1960's



                                                              MATITIAHU  MAYZEL




            There is  nothing new in the presence of Russian (and Soviet) fleet in the Me-
       diterranean. In modern times this phenomenon srarted with che appearance ofRussia
       as a major European military power in the early  18th century, and became a con-
       stane factor of maritime history. lt diminished greatly in the following century, af-
       ter  the  Napoleonic  war,  when  the  Russian  Empire  suffred  a  long,  noticeable
       diplomatic and military decline. The weakness of che USSR in the interwar peri od,
       politica! and diplomatic, military and naval, also precluded naval presence in the
       Mediterranean.  Even after the victory  in  1945, when the USSR appeared as  one
       of the two great superpowers, the situation changed very lirtle. Only che internatio-
       nal quarrels on the status of the Turkish straits, which brought the cold war  into
       the Middle East, signalled what may come. lt was only in the 1950's, after the death
       of Stalin, that Soviet naval units appeared in the Mediterranea n. Thus Soviet naval
       presence in the Mediterranean did not become a strategie problem before che late
       1950's. It took an acute form  in the  1960's and  1970's, and ceased to  be a  pro-
       blem sometimes in the 1980's. During this relatively short period, Soviet Mediter-
       ranean flotilla was a major strategie problem not only for the two great super powers,
       but also for ali Mediterranean states, in particular those of the Middle East. In this
       respect, i t was part of che col d war fought in the middle east, an d, simultaneously,
       also  one component, among many,  of the local  conflicts  in  the region - the most
       noticeable of which was the arab-israeli conflict. Like all historical problems, great
       and small, this one was  not resolved, but disappeared, and reappeared in a chan-
       ged, different form.  In this case it ceased to be a global-strategic problem and tur-
       ned into a regional one. Yet, on the regionallevel, too, the problem has drastically
       changed,  perhaps  to  the  verge  of disappearance.
            Therefore the short history of Soviet naval presence in the Mediterranean pre-
       sents a number of historical problems, each of which requires a different explana-
       tion.  One explanation,  relating to the global-strategic  aspect,  is  "technological":
       the development of technologically more advanced weapon systems made naval de-
       ployment in this confined, relatively closed and small inner sea,  unnecessary (and
       perhaps also dangerous) for the strategie task previously assigned to the Soviet flo-
       tilla. There is a paradox here, for  the Soviet Navy continued to operate in the Me-
       diterranean, even when the global-strategicneeds disappeared. The case is even more
   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354