Page 217 - Le Operazioni Interforze e Multinazionali nella Storia Militare - ACTA Tomo I
P. 217

217
          ActA
          crossing of the Chico-Camacuã River, in full due to heavy rains, on 30 and 31 January,
          in an operation that lasted 36 hours, when the enemy was about a league away, but did
          not notice what was going on, was, unquestionably, the greatest achievement of Bento
          Gonçalves in this campaign.

          5. The naval warfare
             The naval warfare was the offensive element of Brazil’s strategy of war, through the
          declaration of blockade of the Rio de La Plata on December 31, 1825. Buenos Aires
          answered with the declaration of a privateer’s war against the Brazilian navigation, that
          despite causing considerable damage did not compromise deeply the Brazilian economy
          or undercut the war effort in the Cisplatine, being therefore of limited  value to the
          grand strategy and insufficient for the operational strategy. Comparatively analyzed, the
          blockade of the Rio de La Plata and privateering produced results very different in scope
          and effectiveness.
             The blockade, although it was politically costly to the Empire that suffered intense
          pressure from the United States and France, and then from England, to relieve him, even
          softened after 1826, continued to ruin the economy of Buenos Aires - that supported the
          fight alone - and finally destroyed its naval power in the Battle of Monte Santiago (7 and
          April 8, 1827), which combined with the failure of the Alvear’s ground campaign led to
          the Rivadavia’s request for peace by, which did not accomplish.
             In other hand, the Buenos Aires privateering, although it caused havoc and shock
          along the extensive Brazilian coast, driven by ship owners and adventurous Americans
          and Europeans, beyond the control of Buenos Aires’ government, eventually degenerated
          into piracy, as can be appreciate from the comments of the commander of Brazilian
          naval forces in the theater of operations, Admiral Rodrigo Pinto Guedes, Baron of Rio
          da Prata, and the Austrian Ambassador Baron Mareschal, about the capture of United
          States’ ships by privateers  - the ambassador showed curious about the attitude  that
          country would henceforth (MARESCHAL, 1827) – something that reduced the Buenos
          Aires freedom of political maneuver in the conflict.
                The Buenos Ayres privateers are already fully in the practice of piracy, no nation can escape them.
                The British have been extraordinarily insulted and robbed, but I believe that the government is
                satisfying them with the promise of compensations.
                The United States begins suffering. The Schooner Hazard claimed by the virtuous Commodore
                Biddle, and Secretary of State ordered me to hand over, when I had already set free, was taken by a
                Buenos Ayres privateer - Republican Argentino - (GUEDES, 1827).

             Although there have been no joint operations of the Imperial Army and Navy, was
          clear that their operational  strategies  were subortinate  to Brazil’s grand strategy. In
          addition to imposing to the loosening the rules of engagement in the blockade of the
          Plata, the government forbade the bombardment of Buenos Aires by the imperial fleet
          in 1828. It would have been a powerful psychological blow with which to close the
          war, but had the potential to cause difficulties in the process for the peace negotiations
          conducted by the Empire at the start of that year.
             During the war, the Imperial Navy sank, burned and captured a large number of
   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222