Page 215 - Le Operazioni Interforze e Multinazionali nella Storia Militare - ACTA Tomo I
P. 215

215
          ActA
          was ripped aside at the tactical level of battle, while the enemy seemingly “in retreat”
          welled up from behind the opposite hill trying to involve and destroy the two Brazilian
          divisions. Around one o’clock, Barbacena decided to withdraw toward Cacequi to go on
          the defense.
             Passo do Rosário was a battle on the Napoleonic style, influenced by the operational
          strategy that was born at that time. After receiving from Bento Manuel, commander of
          the 1st Brigade of Light Cavalry, the message dated  February 17, in which he stated
          that “the enemy wagons today crossed down [15th] through Campo da Cruz between
          the marshes of  Jacaré and the Cacequi river: it’s certain the withdrawal through São
          Simão” (FRAGOSO, 1951, p. 238, emphasis added) - in fact, an act of concealment
          by Alvear - everything indicates that Barbacena believed the Republican Army was
          inflecting to the west. The Brazilian commander then decided to cross the Santa Maria
          River more to the south, in Passo do Rosário, to bar the march of the Republican Army
          toward the Uruguay River, across which the enemy seemed to want to withdraw. On
          the 19th, seeing that the enemy was also heading toward Passo do Rosário, Barbacena
          decided to pursue the fight and the next day adopted a formation of approach which
          quickly evolved into an attack formation. In turn, Alvear led the Platinos to the chosen
          battlefield under rigorous confidentiality of his intentions: the Republican Army shifted
          its positions after arriving at the destination, some troops crossed the river and returned
          to  the  same  margin  and  its  bivouac  was occupied  in  a  disorderly  way,  giving  the
          impression of a hasty implementation of an ongoing crossing river, thereby enhancing
          the attractiveness for the Army of the South. Interestingly, the different designations of
          the battle assumed by Brazilian and Platinos express their intentions and misconceptions
          during these maneuvers. The Brazilians never reached the Passo do Rosário and the
          Platinos did not fight in Ituzaingó , actually another river and not the stream Imbaé,
                                         15
          currently Imbé, near which the battle took place the day February 20, 1827.
             In the best Napoleonic tradition, the destruction of the Army of the South under
          General  Alvear’s plan  would  occur  according  to  the  concepts  of  strategic  battle:
          “involvement, disruption and exploitation” (Chandler, 1966, p. 184). None of this was
          consummated. The superiority on the field of the Platino cavalry resulted, at most, in a
          whirlwind attack on the baggage trains of the Imperial army, but did not compromise the
          formation of the two Brazilian divisions that although separated and unable to operate
          together, remained in possession of the land where they were, holding off the cavalry that
          harassed them and without any contact or approaching of the enemy infantry. Neither
          could have been any exploitation of success where there had been no break, much less a
          pursuit, when occurs the exponential casualties by deaths and prisoners, something that
          did not happen. When ordered by its commander, the Imperial army withdrew from the
          battlefield at an ordinary pace, with the 2nd Division at the rear collecting the wounded
          and the scattered cattle and leaving behind only an ingrown artillery piece whose repair

          15   Rio Branco, answering questions from Tasso Fragoso about the name given by the Platinos to the Imbaé
             stream, explains: “As seen on the map of Cabrer and of the Spanish and Portuguese pathfinders, the name
             Ituzaingó belonged to the river that presently is called Ibicuí Armada, on the left bank of the Santa Maria
             “(FRAGOSO, 1951, p. 402).
   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220