Page 317 - Le Operazioni Interforze e Multinazionali nella Storia Militare - ACTA Tomo I
P. 317

317
          ActA
          and Boulogne and of the local railway junctions Hazebrouck, Aire, Lillers and St Pol.
          If the major railway junction Amiens was lost, it would cut the connection between the
          northern and southern parts of the front and undermine the Allied defence. Elsewhere
          on the Western Front the communications ran away from the front. The key points close
          to the front were Verdun and Nancy; behind them were railway junctions and finally
          Paris. Paris, Dunkerque, Calais, and Boulogne had to be defended at all cost. Amiens
          was added with pencil in the memo margin to that list. Studd concluded that the Ger-
                                                                  1
          mans could only hope to achieve a quick decision in the north.  On 18 December 1917
          Wilson’s”E-section” under Colonel Hereward Wake became ready with an estimate of
          the coming German offensive. It would be possible from late March. An early date was
          likely. Wake did not consider it likely that the offensive would seek a decision. It would
          only be a limited, holding offensive creating freedom of action for another offensive to
          force the Italians out of the war. On 13 January 1918 General Henry Wilson concluded
          after consultations with London General Staff intelligence that the Germans would at-
                                                                   2
          tack the French because the British were so effective in defence.
             The maritime situation was dominated by a continued effort to contain and defeat the
          U-boat threat.
             It was to be achieved by convoying, attacks on bases, mining of the German Bight
          and by massive mine-fields at the access to the North Sea in the Dover Strait and be-
          tween Scotland and Norway, the latter be completed autumn 1918. The Dover Straits
          barrier was also necessary because of the failure to capture the German Flanders U-boat
          bases by the late summer 1917 offensive. However that barrier was still challenged by
          aggressive operations in mid-February 1918 by the surface units of  Vice-Admiral Lud-
          wig von Schröder’s German Marine Corps in Flanders. At that time the new local British
          naval commander of the ”Dover Patrol”, the aggressive Vice-Admiral Roger Keyes was
          preparing a raid against the enemy Flanders bases. He had further developed plans from
          his previous job as director of the Plans Division of the Admiralty naval staff. Zeebrugge
          and Ostend should be stormed and their harbours closed by block ships. His proposed
                                                               3
          plan was sent to the Admiralty for approval on 25 February.
             At the same time Keyes’ successor as plans director, Captain Cyril Fuller, had consid-
          ered reactions to a possible German land threat to the French Dover Strait ports, and on
          10. February he has outlined his conclusions and recommendations in a memorandum.
          He saw it as unacceptable that these ports, much larger than Zeebrugge and Ostend, fell
          intact into German hands and used as forward U-boat bases. Even if Fuller noted that it
          was highly unlikely that the Allies would ever be forced to evacuate, he still considered
          it necessary to consider the possibility and prepare steps that would hinder such enemy
          use of the ports. He considered Boulogne to be outside the immediate danger area and
          Nieuport as too small to be used for U-boats. Therefore preparations should concentrate


          1    The National Archives of United Kingdom (TNA), CAB/7 3/CA ”The Line in France and Flanders”.
          2    TNA, CAB 25/17 12/D/5 ”Appreciation of General Military Situation from the German Point of View &
             Notes on Situation in Germany”.
          3    Paul G. Halpern (ed.): The Keyes Papers. Selections from the Private and Official  Conference of Admiral of
             the Fleet Baron Keyes of Zeebrugge. (London 1972), pp. 460-475.
   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322